Argumentation in the Quran and disputing it without right is prohibited.
Among those cases is when the verse clearly indicates something contrary to his school of thought.
Yet it bears a weak possibility of agreeing with his school of thought.
So he interprets it according to his school of thought and debates on that basis, despite its clarity against what he says.
As for one to whom this is not apparent, he is excused.
As for interpretation by the scholars, it is permissible and good, and the consensus is settled upon it.
So whoever is qualified for interpretation, possessing the tools to know its meanings, and his opinion is predominantly correct, he interprets it.
If it is something reachable through juristic effort, like clear and hidden meanings, general and specific rulings, grammar, and the like.
And if it is not reachable through juristic effort, like matters of transmission and linguistic interpretation, then speaking on it is not allowed except with authentic transmission from trusted authorities.
As for those who are not its experts due to lack of tools, it is forbidden for them to interpret, but they can convey interpretation from trusted sources.
